治療成效評估工具 - Australian Therapy Outcome Measures (AusTOMs)
原始文獻
1. Therapy outcome measures: Speech‐language pathology technical manual
2. Therapy outcome measures in speech and language therapy: comparing performance between different providers. (原版 TOM)
Pamela M Enderby, Alexandra John. (Northern General Hospital,英國)
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1999 Oct-Dec;34(4):417-29.
Therapy outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: the AusTOMs.
Alison Perry (已退休,ST), Meg Morris(PT), Carolyn Unsworth(目前主要負責者 OT) , Stephen Duckett(公衛), Jemma Skeat(ST), Karen Dodd(PT), Nicholas Taylor(PT), Karen Reilly(OT) (La Trobe University,澳洲)
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Aug ;16(4):285-91.
相關資源官方網站(含表單下載與更新)
2. Therapy outcome measures in speech and language therapy: comparing performance between different providers. (原版 TOM)
Pamela M Enderby, Alexandra John. (Northern General Hospital,英國)
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1999 Oct-Dec;34(4):417-29.
Therapy outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: the AusTOMs.
Alison Perry (已退休,ST), Meg Morris(PT), Carolyn Unsworth(目前主要負責者 OT) , Stephen Duckett(公衛), Jemma Skeat(ST), Karen Dodd(PT), Nicholas Taylor(PT), Karen Reilly(OT) (La Trobe University,澳洲)
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Aug ;16(4):285-91.
相關資源官方網站(含表單下載與更新)
題目版本
- AusTOMs-SP 最初版 for 語言治療 (speech pathologists)
- AusTOMs-OT (occupational therapists)
- AusTOMs-PT (physiotherapists)
發展
- Alison Perry 結合 TOM 與 ICF 核心概念 ,設計一套針對職能(生理)勝任表現、活動參與、安適感進行評估成效之工具
- 希望可以相同模板套用於各治療領域(語言治療、物理治療、職能治療),並可被醫療、學術、保險等專業所認可。
- 雖然發展為三個版本,但各版本之間表單格式相似,治療師可依個案(患者)狀況自其它版本擷取部分表單使用
- 已推廣(並翻譯做文化調適)至紐西蘭、加拿大、瑞典、阿拉伯、冰島、新加坡等國家
- Alison Perry 結合 TOM 與 ICF 核心概念 ,設計一套針對職能(生理)勝任表現、活動參與、安適感進行評估成效之工具
- 希望可以相同模板套用於各治療領域(語言治療、物理治療、職能治療),並可被醫療、學術、保險等專業所認可。
- 雖然發展為三個版本,但各版本之間表單格式相似,治療師可依個案(患者)狀況自其它版本擷取部分表單使用
- 已推廣(並翻譯做文化調適)至紐西蘭、加拿大、瑞典、阿拉伯、冰島、新加坡等國家
工具簡介
- 由具基本評估概念之治療師進行(無須額外受訓)
- 無患者種類與國家地域限制
- 適用於各種年齡層
- 適用於各種診斷患者
- 各種治療情境(社區、學校、醫院等)
- 主要設計用於復健(SP、OT、PT)領域之治療成效 / 服務品質評估
- 治療前 / 後差異
- 判斷是否達到預期設定之治療 / 介入 / 服務成效
- 使用時機:
- 收案進行常規評估時,與個案 / 患者討論並設定治療目標後,即可以AUSTOMs進行評估(前測)
- 待療程 / 階段結束後,再進行一次評估(後測)以判斷是否達到預先設定之改善成效
- AUSTOMs - OT 評估向度
- 針對四向度進行評估
- 生理 / 功能損傷程度
- 活動限制
- 參與限制
- 安適感
- 使用11點量表(越低分越嚴重)
- 0.0分:完全障礙
- 5.0:完全沒有障礙
- AUSTOMs - OT 評估細項
- 生理功能 / 活動限制 (12 項目)
- 學習與知識
- 功能性移動
- 上肢運用
- 日常生活活動執行
- 轉位
- 使用交通工具
- 自我照護
- 居家生活(室內)
- 居家生活(使用家庭資源)
- 人際互動(含人際關係維持)
- 工作(職業、教育等)
- 社區生活(含休閒、遊玩等)
- 總分計算:
- 整體而言,得分越高者,表現 / 動作 / 參與狀態愈佳
- 依患者狀態(治療目標設定)挑選欲評估之項目(無須上述 12 項全部評估)
- 至多評分:(12 項目)X(2向度)+(2向度)= 26 筆數據
引用次數
- Pubmed 以 AUSTOM 為關鍵字,搜尋標題 / 摘要獲得 16篇相關文獻如下:
1. Timmer AJ, Unsworth
CA, Browne M. Occupational therapy and activity pacing with hospital-associated
deconditioned older adults: A randomised controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2019:1-9
2. Unsworth CA, Timmer
A, Wales K. Reliability of the australian therapy outcome measures for
occupational therapy (austoms-ot). Aust
Occup Ther J. 2018;65:376-386 (信效度相關研究)
3. Lin WS, Chou CL,
Chang MH, Chung YM, Lin FG, Tsai PY. Vagus nerve magnetic modulation
facilitates dysphagia recovery in patients with stroke involving the brainstem
- a proof of concept study. Brain
stimulation. 2018;11:264-270
4. Unsworth CA, Coulson
M, Swinton L, Cole H, Sarigiannis M. Determination of the minimal clinically
important difference on the australian therapy outcome measures for
occupational therapy (austoms-ot). Disabil
Rehabil. 2015;37:997-1003 (信效度相關研究)
5. Vogel AP, Brown SE,
Folker JE, Corben LA, Delatycki MB. Dysphagia and swallowing-related quality of
life in friedreich ataxia. Journal of
neurology. 2014;261:392-399
6. Patterson M, Brain
R, Chin R, Veivers D, Back M, Wignall A, et al. Functional swallowing outcomes
in nasopharyngeal cancer treated with imrt at 6 to 42 months post-radiotherapy.
Dysphagia. 2014;29:663-670
7. Fristedt S,
Andersson EE, Unsworth CA. The inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the
self-care and transfer scales, and intra-rater reliability of all scales of the
swedish translation of the australian therapy outcome measures for occupational
therapy (austoms-ot-s). Scandinavian journal
of occupational therapy. 2013;20:182-189 (信效度相關研究)
8. Cheung W, Clayton N,
Li F, Tan J, Milliss D, Thanakrishnan G, et al. The effect of endotracheal tube
size on voice and swallowing function in patients with thermal burn injury: An
evaluation using the australian therapy outcome measures (austoms). International journal of speech-language
pathology. 2013;15:216-220
9. Unsworth CA, Bearup
AM, Rickard KJ. Benchmark comparison of outcomes for clients with upper-limb
dysfunction after stroke using the australian therapy outcome measures for
occupational therapy (austoms-ot). Am J
Occup Ther. 2009;63:732-743
10. Wenke RJ, Theodoros
D, Cornwell P. The short- and long-term effectiveness of the lsvt for
dysarthria following tbi and stroke. Brain
injury. 2008;22:339-352
11. Unsworth CA. Using
the australian therapy outcome measures for occupational therapy (austoms-ot)
to measure outcomes for clients following stroke. Topics in stroke rehabilitation. 2008;15:351-364
12. Brunner M, Skeat J,
Morris ME. Outcomes of speech-language pathology following stroke:
Investigation of inpatient rehabilitation and rehabilitation in the home
programs. International journal of
speech-language pathology. 2008;10:305-313
13. Skeat J, Perry A.
Outcome measurement in dysphagia: Not so hard to swallow. Dysphagia. 2005;20:113-122
14. Skeat J, Perry A.
Outcome measurement in dysphagia: Not so hard to swallow. Dysphagia. 2005;20:390-399
15. Unsworth CA, Duckett
SJ, Duncombe D, Perry A, Skeat J, Taylor N. Validity of the austom scales: A
comparison of the austoms and euroqol-5d. Health
and quality of life outcomes. 2004;2:64 (信效度相關研究)
16. Perry A, Morris M,
Unsworth C, Duckett S, Skeat J, Dodd K, et al. Therapy outcome measures for
allied health practitioners in australia: The austoms. International journal for quality in health care : journal of the
International Society for Quality in Health Care. 2004;16:285-291
